Open your own case

Why Receive the King James Bible?

Follow the preservation case from Scripture to a received text and an English translation. Make each step in the argument visible.

Your assignment

Read Isaiah 40:8, Matthew 24:35, 1 Peter 1:23-25 and 2 Timothy 3:14-17 in context. Then read the 1611 translators’ preface. Which claims come directly from a biblical passage, and which require a further historical judgment?

The promise

God’s enduring word is the foundation of our confidence. These passages support trust in Scripture and its continuing use. They do not name the year 1611 or the English language. Identifying the KJB as the faithful English expression of preservation is a further theological conclusion.

Read Isaiah 40

The received inheritance

We value the KJB’s continuity with the traditional Hebrew Old Testament and received Greek New Testament. Reception among believers matters within our providential understanding of history. The Textus Receptus is a family of printed texts with differences; it is not identical to the manuscript majority. Scrivener’s preface explains his work to identify the Greek readings represented by the Authorized Version.

Read Scrivener’s preface and text

A faithful translation

The 1611 translators explain their use of earlier work, their purpose in translating and their willingness to include marginal alternatives. We receive their Bible without attributing new prophetic inspiration to the translation team. A claim about their intentions should be checked against what they wrote.

Read The Translators to the Reader

Hear the objection

Why identify the KJB rather than another translation? Preservation promises alone do not make that identification. Our preference rests on a combined theological judgment about the received text, translation and providence. Readers who share the promise can disagree about that judgment.

Conclusion of this investigation

Our conviction is that the KJB faithfully gives the preserved Word of God to English readers. This is a stated Christian position, not a claim that historical research proves every KJB reading beyond dispute.

The argument above reaches a stated conclusion. The notebook below is for your own response.

What does the evidence establish?

A knowledge check, not a score for your faith. Read the evidence, then answer all three questions.

1. What do the preservation passages explicitly name?
2. Are the Textus Receptus and manuscript majority identical?
3. Where should a claim about the translators’ aims be checked?

Choose an answer to each question to check your work.

What convinced you—and what remains unanswered?

Optional and private. Nothing entered here is sent to Daniel. Saving stores notes only in this browser on this device, not on your other devices. Anyone using this browser may be able to read saved notes.