Does a preservation promise identify the KJB by name?
No. Scripture teaches the enduring Word of God. Our identification of the KJB as its faithful English expression also involves a theological judgment about the received text, translation and providence. Making that further step explicit completes the argument without pretending it is written into the date 1611.
Follow the evidence →Why is the heavenly-witness wording absent from early Greek manuscripts?
The surviving record does not give a documented history of every copying decision. A Latin explanatory expansion entering the text is one proposed account; a lost early Greek source is a defense proposed by some advocates. The early Greek absence weighs against originality. Ancient Latin use establishes a different, positive finding: the reading was known long before Erasmus.
Follow the evidence →Did Erasmus promise to add the verse if anyone found one Greek copy?
Henk Jan de Jonge’s examination finds no documentary basis for the familiar promise story. Erasmus’s printed editions and late Greek evidence belong in the history, but the dramatic promise should not be repeated as established fact.
Follow the evidence →Did hundreds of African bishops each own a Bible containing 1 John 5:7?
The confession associated with AD 484 witnesses public Latin Christian use. It is not a surviving inventory of each bishop’s personal Bible. Turning a collective confession into hundreds of separately inspected manuscripts overstates the evidence.
Follow the evidence →Could a marginal explanation enter the biblical text?
That is a possible transmission mechanism, not a universal explanation for every longer reading. To argue that it happened in one passage, trace the surviving witnesses, language, forms and dates. A proposed mechanism becomes a historical argument only when tied to the particular evidence.
Follow the evidence →Can patterns or number counts settle the question?
Define the edition, counting rules and expected pattern before counting. Report misses as well as hits and compare alternative texts. Reproducibility can establish that a pattern is present under stated rules; it cannot alone establish divine authorship or eliminate chance and selection effects. This method completes the reasoning without claiming that an untested video has passed it.
Follow the evidence →Does finding one forged manuscript discredit all of them?
No. The evidence about Archaic Mark concerns that particular object. An allegation about another manuscript needs its own evidence.
Follow the evidence →What about 1611 and later KJB editions?
Printers and editors made changes. Identify the exact editions and wording under discussion. Our position distinguishes the received translation from every printer’s execution of it; saying that no difference beyond spelling ever occurred is too broad.
Follow the evidence →